🔗 Share this article

The last time Vladimir Putin visited India in the previous decade, the international order looked entirely distinct. That short trip, limited by the global health crisis, centered around discussions on strategic and defense cooperation between the two nations.

Months later, the large-scale military offensive of Ukraine would transform the Russian leader into a global pariah, significantly restricting his overseas engagements.

Additionally, that period came before a significant shift in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by contentious statements and the imposition of substantial trade tariffs.

"Against this backdrop, the importance of this diplomatic mission to meet Modi cannot be overstated, serving as a symbol of resilient relations and a defiance of external pressure," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Both Nations

The high-level meeting takes place at a crucial time. President Putin arrives after dismissing latest peace proposals for Ukraine, confident due to reported advances by Russian forces.

"From Moscow's perspective, the primary importance of this engagement is its simple happening," commented a prominent analyst based in Moscow. "It indicates a return to something resembling normal international relations."

For India, the risks are even higher. The country navigates a difficult international environment, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a weakened Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

The tightrope walk was highlighted just before the visit, when European ambassadors published a joint opinion piece criticizing Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a firm rebuke from Indian officials, who called it an inappropriate interference.

The Enduring Challenge from the North

The historical partnership originates from the Soviet period and remains deeply entrenched, with Moscow long being Delhi's primary defense supplier. This alliance was largely tolerated by the West until a recent shift.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's large-scale buying of discounted Russian oil. However, in the wake of stalled diplomacy, pressure mounted, leading to punitive tariffs and a significant downturn in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"Consequently, India has reverted to its default strategy of 'hedging'," noted a strategic analyst. "It signals to the US that it has alternatives and is observing how the situation unfolds."

Apart from international politics, India's core motivation with Russia is geography. "Beijing remains the primary security challenge to India, and historically, India has depended on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst stated.

The deepening partnership between Russia and China has raised alarms in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an unbreakable bond between its adversary and its traditional ally.

This concern has also spurred India's drive to reduce its defense procurement, decreasing its dependence on Russian equipment from a dominant share to a reduced portion in recent years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: buy sufficient Russian arms to keep the partnership alive, but avoid so dependent that a supply disruption would leave it vulnerable," the analyst remarked.

The Oil Question

Increased economic cooperation is likely to be a major topic. The Russian leader has recently stressed plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "qualitatively new level", defying Western sanctions.

The issue of crude oil imports is central. While the Indian government has stated to keep buying Russian oil, new sanctions have dampened activity from the commercial buyers. At the same time, India has agreed to boost imports of American oil and gas.

A Kremlin spokesperson admitted "obstacles" in energy trade but said it would proceed uninterrupted. The official minimized the effect of sanctions, stating they would cause only "insignificant" and "temporary" drops and that Russia possesses the "technology" to circumvent them.

Diplomatic Constraints

As talks proceed, the topic of Ukraine is likely to be addressed mainly through India's consistent appeal for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader has access to both sides, the nation does not possess the necessary leverage to alter the course of the war," the analyst noted. "Beyond encouraging talks, its ability to make a difference is limited."

Ultimately, notwithstanding the visible friendship between the two leaders, the partnership is fundamentally one of "pragmatic strategic interest," driven by cold calculation in a volatile world.